18+ | Commercial Content | T&Cs apply | Wagering and T&Cs apply | Play Responsibly | Advertising Disclosure

Supercomputer Predicts 2024 Galway Plate Winner: Life In The Park

Listowel 21 9 22 Life In The Park Rachael Blackmore jump the last to win the Brandon Hotel Beginners Steeplechase Listowel 21 9 22 Life In The Park Rachael Blackmore jump the last to win the Brandon Hotel Beginners Steeplechase
© Photo Healy Racing

We asked our AI Supercomputer at irishracing.com to come up, once again, with a victorious prediction, this time, for the fiercely competitive Galway Plate staged on Wednesday at 19.10.

The winner prediction: Life In The Park (IRE), followed by Let’s Go Champ (IRE) and Perceval Legallois (FR).

Life In The Park is currently one of the outsiders for Wednesday’s big race, but the Supercomputer is predicting that the 7-year-old trained by Henry De Bromhead will come out on top.

Henry De Bromhead has won this race twice before, with Balko Des Flos 2017 and Shanahan’s Turn 2015, and according to our prediction he could be in for a memorable 2024 Galway Plate with stablemate Let’s Go Champ expected to chase home his Life In The Park in the €270,000 feature race.

De Bromhead has achieved the 1-2 in similar big races before, most notably in the 2021 and 2022 Cheltenham Gold Cups and the 2021 Aintree Grand National when Minella Times beat stablemate Balko Des Flos.

In this project, we collated all the historical data we have on previous Galway Plate winners and utilised machine learning techniques to identify the most likely winner among the current contenders for the 2024 race.

Here is a table showing the top five predictions according to our computer generated experiment:

How Does the Supercomputer Predicts the Galway Plate Winner?

The Science

To effectively analyse the data, we applied feature encoding and scaling techniques. Categorical features were encoded using the LabelEncoder, assigning unique numerical labels to each category. Numerical features were standardised using the StandardScaler, ensuring all features were on a similar scale for accurate comparison.

To establish a baseline profile for the typical Galway winner, we calculated the median values of the historical winners’ encoded and scaled feature set. This allowed us to identify the most representative combination of attributes that characterised the typical winner.

To determine the similarity between each historical winner and the most typical winner, we employed cosine similarity. This metric enabled us to measure the similarity in feature space, providing a quantifiable measure of how closely each historical winner matched the most typical winner.

Weighting the data

Recognising that certain features carry more significance in determining the winner, we assigned weights to the important elements within the data. These weights were based on domain knowledge and expert insights. The distance of previous performances, most recent race performance, breeding, key Trial races, betting positions were given higher weights to reflect their greater impact on the prediction.

Determining the most likely winner

Next, we compared the current contenders for the 2024 Galway Plate against the most typical winner using the calculated similarity scores. Each contender’s feature set was encoded and scaled following the same methodology used for historical winners. The similarity scores were adjusted by multiplying them with the respective weights of the important features.

To identify the most likely winner from the current contenders, we aggregated the adjusted similarity scores for each contender. The median value was chosen as the summary statistic for the overall similarity scores. By considering both the feature similarity and the weighted importance of features, we obtained a comprehensive measure of each contender’s likelihood of winning the Galway Plate.

Results and Prediction

This prediction suggests that Life In The Park would most likely win the Galway Plate according to our ML model. A cosine similarity score of 0.994 suggests a relatively high degree of similarity between the most similar contender and the average historical winner. The closer the score is to 1, the more similar the contender is to the historical winners in terms of their features used in the analysis.